I am addressing Ambassador Jeffery's good intentions of thinking of a solution for the safety of my friends at Camp Ashraf:
Mr. Ambassador Jeffery,
Thank you for your exceeding concern over our protection at Camp Ashraf, but allow me to express my sentiments to the proposal as bluntly and sincerely as I could :
“We have stated many times, individually and free of will, as well as during the 6 month interrogation by your 6 Intelligence agencies that : if they are to be killed in Iraq, we prefer to die in Ashraf rather than in an unknown location . We have built Ashraf with our bear hands and sweat of our brows and will prefer to die on its land and water it with out blood , as a message to the next generation of those who sincerely desire FREEDOM, DEMOCRACY and PEACE in Iran and the middle east that; We were not the ones to turn on our obligation, we have always been persevered on our ideal : the genuine happiness of our people .
This is what we were given in 2004, in exchange with what we had collected to protect ourselves against the consecutive terrorist attacks of the Iranian mullahs during the past 15 years.
A CARD that reads “Protected Persons”! under the 4th Geneva Convention.
This Card was given to us by US forces as a status which was defined, as they said at the time, by International Conventions. As far as we are concerned, International Conventions do not finish as do polices change!. International Convention and the adherent protocols all last till the persons involved have reached their final destination.
My Question is: Have you any comment to say to your obligations to the Convention and the R2P protocols which classifies US attitude to our security issue as illegal and a breach of the R2P protocol?
How is it that Ambassador Jeffrey proposes the idea of relocation inside Iraq, but in regards to crime against humanity on April 8, and the independent, fair, and transparent investigation about that crime which the international community has called for, he keeps silence?
Ambassador Jeffrey’s statements made after the Visit by Iraqi President Jalal Talebani to Iran and his explicit assertion regarding cooperation with the religious fascism ruling Iran for closing Ashraf and meeting with Khamenei. and after the statements made by the clerical regime’s Minister of Intelligence, raises further doubts. Mullahs’ Minister of Intelligence announced on June 25 that: In order to destroy Mojahedin, we are working with the Iraqi officials to determine the fate of Ashraf. On June 29, he said: Iraq has pledged that it will carry out positive measures.
The U.S. approach to those wounded in the April 8 crime has been quite unlawful. Of a total of 345 wounded on April 8, only 39 people (about 27%) were transferred to the general hospital in Baquba or Baghdad and then after incomplete treatment were sent back to Ashraf, and only 7 of them were taken to the American hospital near Ashraf, which seemed more like a measure aimed at the press. despite our many calls on them, the U.S. forces have not taken any steps for treating the wounded. Had the U.S. Embassy and the American forces not denied Ashraf residents of medical assistance, today, at least 6 of the 36 killed would have been alive. Similarly, had medical assistance not been denied of Ashraf residents, 4 patients who passed away in recent months due to medical blockade of Ashraf, would not have died.
Following the massacre at our Camp Ashraf, we expected a full investigation into the pre-planned and well orchestrated attack which took my life, my friends’ and at least 34 other residents at point blank range shots by Maliki forces, leaving 350 of my friends seriously wounded.
How do you expect us to move into a location, not supported at all by any US-UN or independent forces with hardly any form of communication with the outside world and yet with the same forces responsible for our massacre looking over us with weapons at point blank range?
As Maryam Rajavi, our president elect has already reiterated at Rome;
"In order to avoid a humanitarian catastrophe, the United Nations must step in. The U.S. has a legal and moral responsibility to protect the residents of Camp Ashraf"
Reuters rightly quoted Mrs. Rajavi as saying;
"The proposal would leave the residents open to attack by the same security forces. If such a displacement took place, they would go to a place which is not known to the international community, they would lose their communications and they would be further isolated. It would lay the ground for their massacre."
The clip here is only a reminder Mr Ambassador , that we still have wounded and sick to be treated, who were denied treatment at the US hospital and are in serious condition. The scenes you may see , are only of those who cannot speak anymore , but we still have those at Ashraf who can testify agaisnt numerous Crimes committed by the mullahs, and THIS is what is feared at Tehran Mr. Ambassador.
Are you willing to help us , or them?
0 comments:
Post a Comment